Skip to main content
Data Products logo
Government & Public Sector

Public trust is built on good decisions. Good decisions need better data.

Government agencies hold the most consequential data in the world — census records, transportation networks, public health statistics, economic indicators. But legacy systems trap it, siloed departments can't share it, and AI adoption is blocked by governance gaps that no one has mapped. We modernize the infrastructure, build the analytics, and implement the responsible AI frameworks that let public sector organizations actually use what they have.

72%
of federal IT budget spent
maintaining legacy systems
EO 14110
executive order on AI — federal
agencies must implement NIST RMF
38B
planned federal IT modernization
spend over the next 5 years
DC + CHI
offices where federal and
state government decisions are made
Federal Agencies
Federal Agencies & Statistical Organizations

Legacy IT modernization, statistical agency data platform transformation, responsible AI governance aligned to NIST AI RMF and OMB M-24-10, federal AI use case inventory and risk classification, and AI literacy programs for federal workforce.

State & Local Government
States, Counties, Cities & Municipalities

Municipal data platforms and open data initiatives, operational efficiency analytics, public health and social services intelligence, budget and performance dashboards, constituent services analytics, and AI governance frameworks for state and local AI adoption.

Transportation & Infrastructure
DOT, Transit Agencies & Infrastructure Operators

Traffic and congestion analytics, transit ridership forecasting and optimization, infrastructure condition monitoring and predictive maintenance, safety incident analytics, multimodal transportation data integration, and capital planning intelligence.

Technology Partners & Institutional Affiliations

Microsoft — Azure Government Cloud IBM Silver Partner — watsonx AI Governance AWS GovCloud Arrow Electronics INFORMS — Operations Research & Analytics IEEE Illinois Institute of Technology University of Illinois Chicago Chamber Approved US Women's Chamber of Commerce
The Compliance Framework

NIST AI RMF is now a
federal mandate — not optional.

Executive Order 14110 and OMB M-24-10 require federal agencies to inventory, classify, and govern AI systems using the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. Most agencies have AI systems already in use that haven't been inventoried, classified, or governed under this framework.

We implement the four NIST AI RMF functions — Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage — as a structured engagement, giving agencies a defensible, documented AI governance posture before the next compliance review.

Explore AI Governance & Responsible AI
NIST AI RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK AI SYSTEM Lifecycle Coverage GOVERN Policy · Roles · Accountability Culture · Organizational practices MAP Categorize AI risks Impact analysis MEASURE Bias & accuracy testing Monitoring metrics MANAGE Risk response plans Residual risk · Incident response Required by EO 14110 · OMB M-24-10 · NIST AI RMF (2023)
72%
of federal IT budget spent maintaining legacy systems — leaving little room to modernize toward AI-ready infrastructure
OMB Federal IT Dashboard, 2024
$38B
planned federal IT modernization investment — agencies that build data readiness now will capture more of it
Federal IT Modernization Report, 2024
710+
federal AI use cases inventoried under EO 14110 — most without NIST RMF governance controls yet in place
OMB AI Inventory Report, 2024
50+
years old — the age of the oldest mission-critical federal systems still in production, per the GAO 2024 legacy IT report
GAO Federal IT Legacy Systems Report, 2024
Government Intelligence

Three forces reshaping
public sector data and AI.

AI executive orders, legacy IT crisis, and sovereign AI infrastructure demand are converging. Here's what's creating urgency — and opportunity — for government technology leaders.

AI Governance
OMB · NIST · White House OSTP
EO 14110 and OMB M-24-10 are now active — federal agencies need NIST RMF posture now
710+ federal AI use cases inventoried — most without documented NIST RMF controls

Executive Order 14110 directed all federal agencies to inventory, classify, and govern AI systems. OMB M-24-10 provides the implementation guidance. Agencies that can't demonstrate NIST AI RMF compliance face procurement restrictions and audit exposure.

What it means for you
If your agency has AI systems in production without a documented NIST RMF governance posture, the clock is running. We conduct AI inventories and implement NIST RMF controls in 6–10 weeks.
Explore AI Governance Practice →
Legacy Modernization
GAO · OMB IT Dashboard
Legacy IT is consuming government modernization budgets before AI investment can start
72% of federal IT budget maintaining legacy systems — GAO, 2024

The GAO's 2024 federal IT report identified 10 critical legacy systems — some over 50 years old — that are security risks and barriers to modern data sharing. Every dollar spent maintaining COBOL on mainframes is a dollar not building the data infrastructure that AI requires.

What it means for you
Modernization doesn't require replacing everything at once. We identify the data extraction and integration layer that unlocks value from legacy systems immediately, before full migration.
Explore Data Engineering Practice →
State AI Policy
NCSL · State CIO Survey
40+ states have introduced AI legislation — state CIOs need NIST RMF posture before their governors do
40+ states introduced AI legislation in 2024 alone — NCSL State AI Policy Tracker

State legislatures are moving faster than agencies can prepare. Colorado, Illinois, Virginia, and Texas have all passed or advanced AI governance legislation. Most state technology offices are scrambling to build compliance posture for AI systems that are already in production — often without an inventory of what they have.

What it means for you
State AI governance requirements are converging toward the federal NIST RMF model. Getting NIST-aligned now protects you against both federal and state compliance exposure — with one framework.
Explore AI Governance Practice →

See how we address each of these

Schedule a Government Strategy Session
Problem → Solution

Pick your challenge.
See exactly how we solve it.

Select any challenge below to see the specific capability, use cases, and practice area we bring to it.

The Challenge
Legacy systems trap government data and block AI adoption

Most federal and state agencies run core operations on systems built in the 1980s and 90s. The data exists — census records, financial systems, benefit databases — but it's inaccessible to modern analytics tools, can't be shared across agencies, and requires manual extraction for any reporting beyond the system's native output.

72% of federal IT budget spent maintaining legacy systems — OMB, 2024
Our answer
Legacy Data Extraction & Platform Modernization

We build the integration and transformation layer that extracts data from legacy systems — COBOL mainframes, COTS government platforms, flat-file exports — normalizes and governs it, and routes it into a modern cloud analytics environment without requiring full system replacement.

Legacy system data extraction via APIs, ETL, and file-based integrations
Data governance framework with lineage, quality controls, and agency-aligned access permissions
Cloud data lakehouse on Azure Government or AWS GovCloud — FedRAMP-aligned architecture
Analytics-ready data without system replacement · FedRAMP-aligned
Explore Data Engineering
The Challenge
AI systems are in production without NIST RMF governance in place

The OMB AI inventory process has surfaced 710+ federal AI use cases — most without documented risk classifications, human oversight mechanisms, bias monitoring, or incident response plans required by NIST AI RMF. Agencies face compliance exposure on systems that were deployed before these requirements existed.

710+ federal AI use cases inventoried — most lacking NIST RMF controls — OMB, 2024
Our answer
NIST AI RMF Implementation

We implement all four NIST AI RMF functions — Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage — as a structured agency engagement: AI system inventory, risk classification, governance control design, technical documentation, bias monitoring, and human oversight implementation.

AI system inventory and risk-tier classification against NIST AI RMF and EO 14110 criteria
Governance framework design — acceptable use policies, human oversight, incident response
Technical controls: bias monitoring, accuracy testing, explainability documentation, audit logging
NIST RMF-compliant posture · Audit-defensible documentation
Explore AI Governance
The Challenge
Statistical agencies are publishing on reporting cycles that no longer match policy needs

Federal and state statistical agencies — census, labor, health, economic — collect massive datasets but publish on quarterly or annual cycles. The platforms underlying this work are often decades old, and the gap between data collection and accessible publication leaves policymakers making decisions on stale information.

6–12 mo typical lag between data collection and publication for major federal statistical programs
Our answer
Statistical Agency Data Platform Modernization

We modernize statistical agency data platforms — migrating collection, processing, validation, and publication workflows to cloud architectures — reducing cycle times, enabling real-time dashboards for internal analysts, and improving public data portal accessibility.

Statistical data pipeline modernization on Azure Government or AWS GovCloud
Data quality validation and provenance tracking for statistical integrity
Public data portal and API development for open data publication
Faster publication cycles · Better data quality · Open data APIs
Explore Data Engineering
The Challenge
Transportation agencies manage enormous data streams with limited real-time visibility

Transit agencies, DOTs, and infrastructure operators collect sensor data, ridership records, maintenance logs, and safety incident reports across dispersed systems. The data that should drive route optimization, predictive maintenance, and capital planning is fragmented across vendors, siloed by department, and days or weeks stale by the time anyone analyzes it.

$50B+ annual cost of traffic congestion in the US — much of it analytically addressable
Our answer
Transportation & Infrastructure Analytics

We build integrated transportation data platforms that unify sensor feeds, ridership data, maintenance records, and incident logs — powering real-time operations dashboards, predictive maintenance for infrastructure assets, and data-driven capital planning.

Multi-source sensor and ridership data integration with real-time processing
Predictive maintenance models for bridges, roads, rail, and fleet assets
Route optimization and congestion analytics dashboards for operations teams
Real-time operational visibility · Predictive asset maintenance
Explore AI & Machine Learning
The Challenge
City and county data is siloed across departments and inaccessible to the public

Municipal governments manage dozens of independent data systems — permitting, utilities, public safety, budget, social services — with no unified layer connecting them. Residents can't access meaningful open data. Administrators can't see cross-department trends. And state and federal reporting requirements consume staff time that should be spent on service delivery.

73% of municipalities lack a unified data strategy — IBM Center for the Business of Government, 2024
Our answer
Municipal Data Platform & Open Data Initiative

We build municipal data platforms that unify city department data into a governed analytics environment — enabling executive dashboards, cross-department intelligence, automated state and federal reporting, and public-facing open data portals.

Cross-department data integration — permitting, utilities, public safety, social services
Executive dashboards and KPI tracking for city performance management
Open data portal with public API for transparency and civic engagement
Unified city intelligence · Open data transparency · Reporting automation
Explore BI & Analytics
The Challenge
Government hiring pipelines can't compete with private sector for data and AI talent

Federal and state agencies consistently lose data scientists, ML engineers, and data engineers to private sector salary competition and hiring speed. Government procurement cycles often take longer than a private company takes to make an offer. The result: agencies either go without critical technical capacity or rely on expensive prime contractors for work that shouldn't require them.

40–60% below US market rates — LATAM data engineers and analysts for government capacity gaps
Our answer
Government AI & Data Staff Augmentation

We source vetted LATAM data engineers, analysts, and ML practitioners for government agencies and their prime contractors — at 40–60% below US rates, in US time zones, with 2–4 week placement timelines that fit within existing contract vehicles.

Data engineers, analysts, and ML practitioners with public sector domain familiarity
Contractor and subcontractor models compatible with existing IDIQs and task orders
2–4 week placement with security awareness training and NIST-aligned practices
2–4 week placement · 40–60% below GSA schedule rates
Explore Staff Augmentation
Why Data Products

What sets us apart
for government engagements.

Government procurement is slow. Government data is sensitive. Generic consultancies don't understand NIST RMF, FedRAMP, or the political realities of agency technology change. We're built differently — and these differences matter when the stakes are public accountability.

Washington DC office — federal procurement proximity

Our Washington DC presence means federal procurement conversations, agency relationship development, and compliance review meetings happen in person — not across time zones. It matters for trust-building in government.

vs. Remote-only consultancies: no DC presence
NIST RMF and compliance designed in, not retrofitted

NIST SP 800-53, NIST AI RMF, and FedRAMP-aligned architecture are structural requirements of every government engagement — shaping platform choice, access controls, and documentation from the first design session.

vs. Commercial firms: compliance as an add-on
Chicago HQ + Washington DC — where decisions are made

Federal procurement trust is built in person. Our Washington DC presence means agency relationship development, compliance review meetings, and procurement conversations happen face-to-face — not over video calls from a city that's never navigated a GSA Schedule.

vs. Remote-only consultancies: no DC presence or procurement network
IBM Silver Partner — watsonx for responsible government AI

IBM watsonx is among the few AI platforms with on-premise deployment, government cloud availability, and built-in bias monitoring and explainability. As an IBM Silver Partner, we have deployment depth that certification alone doesn't convey.

vs. Boutiques: no enterprise AI platform depth
Start Here

Not ready for a full engagement?
Start with a defined, auditable pilot.

Government procurement requires defensible scope and clear deliverables. Our fixed-scope starter programs are designed for agency procurement realities — defined outputs, defined timelines, and a clear path to a larger follow-on.

6–8 Weeks
Government AI & Data Readiness Assessment

We audit your data infrastructure, map your AI use case portfolio against NIST RMF risk tiers, identify legacy integration opportunities, and deliver a phased modernization roadmap with acquisition-cycle-aligned milestones and budget ranges.

See what's included
6–10 Weeks
Responsible AI Audit & NIST RMF Mapping

We conduct an AI system inventory, classify each system against NIST AI RMF risk tiers, identify governance gaps, and produce a documented compliance posture with prioritized remediation steps — audit-ready for OMB and inspector general review.

See what's included
6 Weeks
Legacy Data Modernization Sprint

We extract, normalize, and load data from one legacy system into a governed cloud analytics environment — with a working dashboard and an integration architecture that can be extended to additional source systems in subsequent phases.

See what's included
5 Minutes
Government AI Literacy Assessment

A free NuScienta diagnostic that benchmarks AI and data literacy across your agency workforce — identifying where staff confidence is high, where gaps are largest, and where AI literacy investment will have the most impact on mission delivery.

Take the free assessment
Ready to move forward

Let's talk about what your agency's
data should be doing for the public.

Whether you're modernizing legacy infrastructure, implementing NIST AI RMF, building a transportation analytics platform, or deploying a municipal data intelligence system — the conversation starts here. Chicago and Washington DC, ready to engage.

Questions & Answers

Government data & AI —
the questions we hear most.

From CDOs at federal agencies to data directors at city governments — here are the questions that come up in every first conversation.

What government clients do you work with?
We work with federal agencies on statistical agency modernization, responsible AI governance, and legacy IT platform transformation. At the state and local level we work with government departments on municipal data platforms, open data initiatives, and operational analytics. We also work with transportation agencies — DOTs, transit authorities, and infrastructure operators — on traffic analytics, ridership forecasting, and predictive maintenance for infrastructure assets.
How do you approach NIST AI RMF compliance?
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework requires organizations to Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage AI risks across the full system lifecycle. We help agencies implement NIST AI RMF by conducting AI system inventories, classifying systems against the risk tiers, and building the governance controls, technical documentation, bias monitoring, and human oversight mechanisms the framework requires. For agencies operating under OMB M-24-10, we design implementation roadmaps that align to the framework's core functions while accounting for existing procurement and acquisition cycles.
Do you hold security clearances?
Data Products LLC operates as a civilian consulting firm. Our team does not currently hold active federal security clearances. We are best suited to unclassified and CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) environments — open data platforms, statistical agency modernization, state and local government analytics, and transportation data systems. For engagements requiring cleared personnel, we recommend positioning us as a technical subcontractor for the data and AI workstream within a prime contractor relationship.
How do you handle data security for government clients?
For government engagements, we follow NIST SP 800-53 security controls, implement role-based access controls with audit logging, and architect platforms with data residency and sovereignty requirements built in from the first design session. For CUI environments, we follow NIST SP 800-171 requirements. We deploy on FedRAMP-authorized cloud platforms (Azure Government, AWS GovCloud) where applicable to meet agency cloud authorization requirements.
What does a typical government AI engagement look like?
Most government engagements begin with a 6–8 week AI and Data Readiness Assessment — we audit data infrastructure, map the AI use case portfolio against NIST RMF risk tiers, identify modernization priorities, and produce a phased roadmap with acquisition-cycle-aligned milestones. First implementation phases typically target one high-ROI use case — statistical reporting automation, a transportation analytics platform, or a responsible AI governance framework — with subsequent phases expanding as funding and approvals allow.